I use it rather extensively in searching loads because I’m happy with moment of deer (normally a lot better with three shot groups @ about an inch) precision furthermore greatest velocity.
"Presented enough penetration, a larger diameter bullet can have an edge in wounding performance. It will injury a blood vessel the smaller sized projectile scarcely misses.
004 longer than any of my other fired instances utilizing Hornandy gauge, so I checked some outdated cases and shot a handful of manufacturing facility Winchester rounds to be sure and absolutely sure plenty of the ttsx's i just loaded had much more head Area extend or duration by a .004
I believe you already know, but the maximum COL for journal feeding as a result of an AR15 is usually looked upon as two.26". Nearly anything beyond that is likely to lead to the bullet to hold-up in the journal. When you are manually feeding rounds one after the other, you'll be Alright with your stated COL, but I don't understand why you'd want to show your RRA into one shot.
Have you ever made use of Hodgdon’s CFE 223 ball powder? CFE means Copper Fouling Eraser and is also made to present greater accuracy for for a longer period periods of time with fewer cleansing, making it perfect for Competitors and varmint shooters. It’s also not only for 223!
The .308 Winchester is undoubtedly an American typical which offers versatility. A broad collection of bullets, powders and precision instances permit handloaders to assemble ammunition that is better in just about every regard than at any time in its 66-yr background.
Should your telling me the xbt data is the same for your tsx/ttsx I'll proceed up the ladder and Verify and recheck as i go... is head Room moving out .004 of the inch everything to bother with, all primers seemed great the belt within the situation was in fact significantly less less than the factory winchester rounds.
I'v read loading all click here copper bullets: again off demand two whole grains and skinny study An additional that says the grooves from the ttsx helps you to load similar to any bullet of exact pounds???
But I've plenty of H335 and am endeavoring to get it to shoot as exact as the CFE223 powder. Has anybody chronoed CFE223 loads with 55 gr bullets that may put up the final results ? rebs
Superior friends will come bail you out of jail. A best friend will likely be sitting down beside you in the mobile expressing damn that was enjoyment!
We use cookies to make your practical experience better. To comply with the new e-Privacy directive, we have to ask on your consent to established the cookies.
I assume is flows really easy, so speedy, the turning feeder tube that carries powder within the hopper to the dimensions pan would feed it so rapidly it will operate over the weight ahead of the feeder tube would decelerate. I tried changing the speed in the feeder tube and time it slowed down to complete from the demand and absolutely nothing served. I'd to do loads of powder trickling into the size pan manually to receive by way of Those people 50 rounds of check/trial ammo. I have not tried using the CFE223 because as the trial loads failed to impress me for group measurement vs. the BLC2 or H335.
2 grains and never exceed 3100 fps. The outcomes posted inside the manual for an extended barrel do yield increased values, but it really would appear that the value with the NATO ammunition in that barrel would yield even larger values.
I required to look for a faster means of loading, that’s After i started off using H335. I'd the exact same success you did, applying an RCBS powder evaluate, my expenses we’re usually inside 0.1 grain. Making use of H335 I utilised thrown costs completely.